Car comparison

AUDI Q2L 35 TFSIvsMazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q2L

35 TFSI

150 hp1395 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018

2.0 SKYACTIV-G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2018-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    200 km/h
    124 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    820 km
    509 mi
  • Best overall score
    53/100
  • Best performance score
    41/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ2L35 TFSIMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
207Nm153lb-ft
Curb weight
1,405kg3,097lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight-
1,773kg3,909lb
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
77.4s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
76.9s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.8s
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
820km509mi
Calculated
629km391mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,395cc85cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,236mm167in
4,275mm168in
Width
1,785mm70in
1,765mm69in
Height
1,548mm61in
1,535mm60in
Wheelbase
2,628mm103in
2,570mm101in
Front track
1,543mm61in
1,523mm60in
Rear track
1,546mm61in
1,521mm60in
Ground clearance-
155mm6in
Trunk volume
347L
350L
Max trunk volume-
1,260L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
44L
CO2 emissions-
160g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q2L 35 TFSIMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ2L35 TFSIMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
207 Nm
153 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
200 km/h
124 mph
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI8.7 s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI and Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI and Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
820 km
509 mi
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
629 km
391 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
150 hp
112 kW
8.7 s
200 km/h
124 mph
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
347 L
12.3 cu ft
Length
4,236 mm
166.8 in
Height
1,548 mm
60.9 in
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
8.7 s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ2L35 TFSIMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
207 Nm
153 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
347 L
12.3 cu ft
Length
4,236 mm
166.8 in
Height
1,548 mm
60.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Range score
820 km
509 mi
629 km
391 mi
CO2 score
-
160 g/km
Trunk score
347 L
12.3 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q2L 35 TFSIMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI

  • Has 43 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 191 km (119 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

  • Is 95 kg lighter
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 3 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI
Mazda CX-3 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

35 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ235 TDI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
35 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TFSI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
35 TFSI
1.4 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
35 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
35 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
35 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI vs Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G - car comparison - FastVsFaster