Car comparison

AUDI Q2 · Facelift 2020 40 TFSIvsFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q2 · Facelift 2020

40 TFSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present
VS

Ford Puma

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lightest
    1,358 kg
    2,994 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    456 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSIFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
190hp142kW
200hp149kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,460kg3,219lb
1,358kg2,994lb
Gross weight
2,045kg4,508lb
1,815kg4,001lb
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
71.7s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
69.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
28.0s
Calculated
32.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
833km518mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,496cc91cu in
Length
4,208mm166in
4,226mm166in
Width
1,794mm71in
-
Height
1,508mm59in
1,520mm60in
Wheelbase
2,601mm102in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,546mm61in
-
Rear track
1,542mm61in
-
Ground clearance-
152mm6in
Trunk volume
355L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,000L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 40 TFSIFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSIFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.0 s
32.6 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
190 hp
142 kW
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost has 10 hp more than AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 40 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 40 TFSI and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
1,358 kg
2,994 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
231 km/h
144 mph
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI6.7 s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6.7 s

Although Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost has more power, AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 40 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 40 TFSI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
190 hp
142 kW
6.7 s
231 km/h
144 mph
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
6.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
4,208 mm
165.7 in
Height
1,508 mm
59.4 in
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
6.7 s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSIFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
190 hp
142 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
6.7 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
4,208 mm
165.7 in
Height
1,508 mm
59.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Range score
833 km
518 mi
-
Trunk score
355 L
12.5 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 40 TFSIFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 40 TFSI

  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 102 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 101 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q2 40 TFSI
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

40 TFSI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSIvsAUDIQ240 TFSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
40 TFSI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSIvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
40 TFSI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSIvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
40 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
40 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
40 TFSI
45 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
AUDI Q2 · Facelift 2020 40 TFSI vs Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster