Car comparison

Aspark OWL 64 kWhvsMcLaren 620R 3.8 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Aspark OWL

64 kWh

2012 hpElectricAWDCoupe2020-present
VS

McLaren 620R

3.8 V8

620 hp3799 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Aspark OWL 64 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    1.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    400 km/h
    249 mph
  • Most powerful
    2,012 hp
    1,500 kW
  • Highest torque
    2,000 Nm
    1,475 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    1,059 hp/t
    790 kW/t
    0.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    94/100

McLaren 620R 3.8 V8

  • Lightest
    1,386 kg
    3,056 lb
  • Largest trunk
    120 L
  • Best economy score
    72/100
  • Best practicality score
    31/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAsparkOWL64 kWhMcLaren620R3.8 V8
Power
2,012hp1,500kW
620hp462kW
Torque
2,000Nm1,475lb-ft
620Nm457lb-ft
Curb weight
1,900kg4,189lb
1,386kg3,056lb
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
322 km/h
200 mph
To 99% top speed
28.9s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph
Calculated
42.9s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
1.9s
2.9s
0-200 km/h
4.5s
Calculated
8.1s
0-60 mph
1.8s
Calculated
2.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
8.3s
Calculated
10.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
1,059hp/t790kW/t480hp/1000 lb
Calculated
447hp/t334kW/t203hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
1,053Nm/t704lb-ft/ton
Calculated
447Nm/t299lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
550km342mi
Calculated
Displacement-
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,791mm189in
4,557mm179in
Width
1,935mm76in
1,944mm77in
Height
993mm39in
1,194mm47in
Wheelbase
2,750mm108in
2,670mm105in
Front track-
1,680mm66in
Rear track-
1,618mm64in
Ground clearance
160mm6in
-
Trunk volume
50L
120L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank-
72L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAsparkOWL64 kWhMcLaren620R3.8 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
1.8 s
2.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
1.9 s
2.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.5 s
8.1 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
10.5 s
-
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
322 km/h
200 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.5 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
3.8 s
4.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.6 s
6.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.1 s
8.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.3 s
10.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
290 km/h
180 mph
227 km/h
141 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
McLaren620R3.8 V8
620 hp
462 kW

Aspark OWL 64 kWh has 1,392 hp more than McLaren 620R 3.8 V8.

The biggest power difference is between McLaren 620R 3.8 V8 and Aspark OWL 64 kWh: 1,392 hp (1,038 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,000 Nm
1,475 lb-ft
McLaren620R3.8 V8
620 Nm
457 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
McLaren620R3.8 V8
1,386 kg
3,056 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
400 km/h
249 mph
McLaren620R3.8 V8
322 km/h
200 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh1.9 s
McLaren620R3.8 V82.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aspark OWL 64 kWh and McLaren 620R 3.8 V8: 1.0 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
1,059 hp/t
790 kW/t
0.9 kg/hp
McLaren620R3.8 V8
447 hp/t
334 kW/t
2.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
1.9 s
400 km/h
249 mph
McLaren620R3.8 V8
620 hp
462 kW
2.9 s
322 km/h
200 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AsparkOWL64 kWh
Power
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
0-100 km/h1.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
50 L
1.8 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
993 mm
39.1 in
McLaren620R3.8 V8
Power
620 hp
462 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,557 mm
179.4 in
Height
1,194 mm
47.0 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAsparkOWL64 kWhMcLaren620R3.8 V8
Power
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
620 hp
462 kW
Torque
2,000 Nm
1,475 lb-ft
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
Acceleration
1.9 s
2.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
322 km/h
200 mph
Lightness
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
1,386 kg
3,056 lb
Fuel consumption
-
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
50 L
1.8 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
993 mm
39.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,557 mm
179.4 in
Height
1,194 mm
47.0 in
Range score
-
550 km
342 mi
Trunk score
50 L
1.8 cu ft
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
1,059 hp/t
790 kW/t
0.9 kg/hp
447 hp/t
334 kW/t
2.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMcLaren 620R 3.8 V8
Consumption13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.93 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.89 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,439 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Aspark OWL 64 kWh

  • Has 1,392 hp more
  • Has 1,380 Nm more
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 78 km/h (48 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 612 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

McLaren 620R 3.8 V8

  • Is 514 kg lighter
  • Has 70 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Aspark OWL 64 kWh
McLaren 620R 3.8 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

64 kWh
120 kWh
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsRimacNevera120 kWh
3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren620R3.8 V8vsMcLaren600LT3.8 V8
64 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
3.8 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren620R3.8 V8vsMcLarenGT4.0 V8
64 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
3.8 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren620R3.8 V8vsMcLarenGTS4.0 V8
64 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren620R3.8 V8vsMcLaren570S3.8 V8
64 kWh
5.0 V8
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsKoenigseggOne:15.0 V8
3.8 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren620R3.8 V8vsMcLaren720S4.0 V8
64 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
3.8 V8
625C 3.8 V8
VS
McLaren620R3.8 V8vsMcLaren650S Coupe625C 3.8 V8
Aspark OWL 64 kWh vs McLaren 620R 3.8 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster