Car comparison

Aspark OWL 64 kWhvsMaserati MC20 3.0 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Aspark OWL

64 kWh

2012 hpElectricAWDCoupe2020-present
VS

Maserati MC20

3.0 V6

630 hp3000 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Aspark OWL 64 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    1.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    400 km/h
    249 mph
  • Most powerful
    2,012 hp
    1,500 kW
  • Highest torque
    2,000 Nm
    1,475 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    1,059 hp/t
    790 kW/t
    0.9 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    94/100

Maserati MC20 3.0 V6

  • Lightest
    1,500 kg
    3,307 lb
  • Largest trunk
    150 L
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    32/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAsparkOWL64 kWhMaseratiMC203.0 V6
Power
2,012hp1,500kW
630hp470kW
Torque
2,000Nm1,475lb-ft
730Nm538lb-ft
Curb weight
1,900kg4,189lb
1,500kg3,307lb
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
28.9s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph
Calculated
59.6s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
1.9s
2.9s
0-200 km/h
4.5s
Calculated
8.8s
0-60 mph
1.8s
Calculated
2.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
8.3s
Calculated
10.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
1,059hp/t790kW/t480hp/1000 lb
Calculated
420hp/t313kW/t191hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
1,053Nm/t704lb-ft/ton
Calculated
487Nm/t326lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
517km321mi
Calculated
Displacement-
3,000cc183cu in
Length
4,791mm189in
4,669mm184in
Width
1,935mm76in
1,965mm77in
Height
993mm39in
1,221mm48in
Wheelbase
2,750mm108in
2,700mm106in
Front track-
1,681mm66in
Rear track-
1,649mm65in
Ground clearance
160mm6in
-
Trunk volume
50L
150L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank-
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAsparkOWL64 kWhMaseratiMC203.0 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
1.8 s
2.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
1.9 s
2.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.5 s
8.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
10.5 s
39.4 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.5 s
1.7 s
330 ft
101 m
3.8 s
4.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.6 s
6.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.1 s
8.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.3 s
10.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
290 km/h
180 mph
219 km/h
136 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
630 hp
470 kW

Aspark OWL 64 kWh has 1,382 hp more than Maserati MC20 3.0 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Maserati MC20 3.0 V6 and Aspark OWL 64 kWh: 1,382 hp (1,031 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,000 Nm
1,475 lb-ft
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
730 Nm
538 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
1,500 kg
3,307 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
400 km/h
249 mph
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh1.9 s
MaseratiMC203.0 V62.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aspark OWL 64 kWh and Maserati MC20 3.0 V6: 1.0 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
1,059 hp/t
790 kW/t
0.9 kg/hp
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
420 hp/t
313 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
1.9 s
400 km/h
249 mph
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
630 hp
470 kW
2.9 s
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AsparkOWL64 kWh
Power
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
0-100 km/h1.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
50 L
1.8 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
993 mm
39.1 in
MaseratiMC203.0 V6
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
150 L
5.3 cu ft
Length
4,669 mm
183.8 in
Height
1,221 mm
48.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAsparkOWL64 kWhMaseratiMC203.0 V6
Power
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
630 hp
470 kW
Torque
2,000 Nm
1,475 lb-ft
730 Nm
538 lb-ft
Acceleration
1.9 s
2.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Lightness
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
1,500 kg
3,307 lb
Fuel consumption
-
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
50 L
1.8 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
993 mm
39.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
150 L
5.3 cu ft
Length
4,669 mm
183.8 in
Height
1,221 mm
48.1 in
Range score
-
517 km
321 mi
Trunk score
50 L
1.8 cu ft
150 L
5.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
1,059 hp/t
790 kW/t
0.9 kg/hp
420 hp/t
313 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaserati MC20 3.0 V6
Consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,045 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Aspark OWL 64 kWh

  • Has 1,382 hp more
  • Has 1,270 Nm more
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 65 km/h (40 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 639 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Maserati MC20 3.0 V6

  • Is 400 kg lighter
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Aspark OWL 64 kWh
Maserati MC20 3.0 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

64 kWh
120 kWh
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsRimacNevera120 kWh
3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
MaseratiMC203.0 V6vsMaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6
64 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
MaseratiMC203.0 V6vsMaseratiMCPURA3.0 V6
64 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
MaseratiMC203.0 V6vsMaseratiGT2 Stradale3.0 V6
64 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
3.0 V6
3.8 V8
VS
MaseratiMC203.0 V6vsMcLaren620R3.8 V8
64 kWh
5.0 V8
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsKoenigseggOne:15.0 V8
3.0 V6
3.9 V8
VS
MaseratiMC203.0 V6vsFerrariRoma3.9 V8
64 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
3.0 V6
4.0 V8
VS
MaseratiMC203.0 V6vsMcLarenGT4.0 V8
Aspark OWL 64 kWh vs Maserati MC20 3.0 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster