Artega GT
Car comparison
Artega GT 3.6 V6vsAUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT RS Coupe (8J)
2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions214 g/km
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Artega GT 3.6 V6
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,285 kg2,833 lb
- Best estimated range708 km440 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
Specification comparison
| Model | ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,285kg2,833lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.4s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 60.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 310Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 652km405mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,597cc220cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,015mm158in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,180mm46in | 1,342mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,460mm97in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 290L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 700L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 223g/km | 214g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Artega GT 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 6,600 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 5,400-6,500 rpm | 1,600-6,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 15.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI has 40 hp more than Artega GT 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Artega GT 3.6 V6 and AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 4.8 s |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI and Artega GT 3.6 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 708 km 440 mi |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 652 km 405 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 652 km 405 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 223 g/km | 214 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Artega GT 3.6 V6 | AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Artega GT 3.6 V6
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 56 km (35 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























