Car comparison

Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselvsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpina D3 Touring (E91)

2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel

214 hp1995 ccDieselRWDManualTwin-turboWagon / estate2008-2013
VS

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.0 T

210 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    214 hp
    160 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,109 km
    689 mi
  • Largest trunk
    460 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
214hp160kW
210hp157kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,625kg3,583lb
1,535kg3,384lb
Gross weight
2,090kg4,608lb
2,080kg4,586lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
74.1s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
75.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
26.3s
Calculated
31.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,109km689mi
Calculated
699km434mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,541mm179in
4,716mm186in
Width
1,817mm72in
1,802mm71in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,543mm61in
Wheelbase
2,760mm109in
2,675mm105in
Front track
1,500mm59in
1,524mm60in
Rear track
1,513mm60in
1,506mm59in
Ground clearance-
127mm5in
Trunk volume
460L
419L
Max trunk volume
1,385L
1,273L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel4,100 rpm2,000 rpm4,350 rpm
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T5,300 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm5,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.3 s
31.2 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
214 hp
160 kW
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW

Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel has 4 hp more than Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
1,535 kg
3,384 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
241 km/h
150 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel7.2 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 2.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
1,109 km
689 mi
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
699 km
434 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
214 hp
160 kW
7.2 s
241 km/h
150 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
Power
214 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,541 mm
178.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
Power
214 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
7.2 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
214 hp
160 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.8 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,541 mm
178.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Range score
1,109 km
689 mi
699 km
434 mi
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 410 km (255 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 41 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Is 90 kg lighter
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
2.0 TSI
VS
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
2.0 TSI
VS
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.4 JTDM 20V
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
JCW 1.6
VS
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselvsMiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
2.0 T
2.5T
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
2.5 T5
VS
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselvsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 T
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
2.0 TSI
VS
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
2.0 T
1.6 RC
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsPeugeot207 SW1.6 RC
2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
2.4 i-VTEC
VS
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselvsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
2.0 T5
VS
AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselvsVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel vs Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster