Alpina D3 Touring (E91)
Car comparison
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselvsVolvo V70 III 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V70 III
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,109 km689 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score92/100
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 214hp160kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,806kg3,982lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 2,410kg5,313lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.1s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 80.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.3s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,109km689mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,541mm179in | 4,823mm190in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,547mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,816mm111in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,586mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 151mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,385L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 195g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel: Power / Torque
- Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 4,100 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,980 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.3 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 214 hp 160 kW |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 has 26 hp more than Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 1,806 kg 3,982 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 7.2 s |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 7.9 s |
Although Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 has more power, Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 1,109 km 689 mi |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 214 hp 160 kW | 7.2 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 214 hp 160 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,806 kg 3,982 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,109 km 689 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 195 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 181 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 276 km (171 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























