Alpina D3 Touring (E91)
Car comparison
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DiselvsSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful214 hp160 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,109 km689 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 214hp160kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.1s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.3s Calculated | 28.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,109km689mi Calculated | 886km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,541mm179in | 4,670mm184in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 442L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,385L | 1,354L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 4,100 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.3 s | 28.5 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 214 hp 160 kW |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel has 14 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 7.2 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 1,109 km 689 mi |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 886 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 214 hp 160 kW | 7.2 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 214 hp 160 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,109 km 689 mi | 886 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Disel
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 223 km (139 mi) more estimated range
- Has 18 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























