Alpina B8 (E36)
Car comparison
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32VvsMercedes-Benz E-class (W210) AMG E 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W210)
AMG E 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed281 km/h175 mph
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight222 hp/t166 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range841 km522 mi
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score77/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) AMG E 55 V8
- Most powerful354 hp264 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Best overall score73/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333hp248kW | 354hp264kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.4s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph Calculated | 54.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.6s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.8L/100 km13.2mpg US15.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 313Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 841km522mi Calculated | 661km411mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,619cc282cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,433mm175in | 4,795mm189in |
| Width | 1,698mm67in | 1,799mm71in |
| Height | 1,373mm54in | 1,411mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,833mm112in |
| Front track | 1,412mm56in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,434mm56in | 1,543mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 395L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 95L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) AMG E 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 5,700 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.6 s | 16.7 s |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 333 hp 248 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | 354 hp 264 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) AMG E 55 V8 has 21 hp more than Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) AMG E 55 V8: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 5.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | 5.7 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) AMG E 55 V8 has more power, Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) AMG E 55 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) AMG E 55 V8: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 841 km 522 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | 661 km 411 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 333 hp 248 kW | 5.6 s | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)AMG E 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp 248 kW | 354 hp 264 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 841 km 522 mi | 661 km 411 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 395 L 13.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 180 km (112 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) AMG E 55 V8
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























