Alpina B8 (E36)
Car comparison
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32VvsBMW M3 (E36) 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 (E36)
3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed281 km/h175 mph
- Most powerful333 hp248 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight222 hp/t166 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range841 km522 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score77/100
BMW M3 (E36) 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | BMWM3 (E36)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333hp248kW | 321hp239kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,460kg3,219lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.4s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph Calculated | 51.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.6s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 313Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 841km522mi Calculated | 564km350mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,619cc282cu in | 3,201cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,433mm175in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,698mm67in | 1,696mm67in |
| Height | 1,373mm54in | 1,365mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,412mm56in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,434mm56in | 1,438mm57in |
| Trunk volume | 395L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 95L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 (E36) 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 5,700 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | BMWM3 (E36)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.6 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 183 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 333 hp 248 kW |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW |
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V has 12 hp more than BMW M3 (E36) 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 and Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 5.6 s |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 5.5 s |
Although Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V has more power, BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 and Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 841 km 522 mi |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 564 km 350 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 333 hp 248 kW | 5.6 s | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp 248 kW | 321 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 841 km 522 mi | 564 km 350 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 395 L 13.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V | BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 277 km (172 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M3 (E36) 3.2
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























