Maserati Quattroporte IV
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32VvsAlpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina B8 (E36)
4.6 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight222 hp/t166 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range841 km522 mi
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score77/100
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful336 hp251 kW
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 336hp251kW | 333hp248kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,647kg3,631lb | 1,500kg3,307lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 56.4s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 204hp/t152kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 313Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 611km379mi Calculated | 841km522mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 4,619cc282cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,698mm67in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,373mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,412mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,502mm59in | 1,434mm56in |
| Trunk volume | - | 395L |
| Max trunk volume | 475L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 95L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 5,700 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 15.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 336 hp 251 kW |
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 333 hp 248 kW |
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V has 3 hp more than Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V and Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 281 km/h 175 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 5.8 s |
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 5.6 s |
Although Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V has more power, Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V and Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V and Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 611 km 379 mi |
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 841 km 522 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 336 hp 251 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 333 hp 248 kW | 5.6 s | 281 km/h 175 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 336 hp 251 kW | 333 hp 248 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | 281 km/h 175 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 611 km 379 mi | 841 km 522 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 395 L 13.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V | Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 147 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 230 km (143 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























