Alpina B8 (E36)
Car comparison
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32VvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997
AMG C 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed281 km/h175 mph
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight222 hp/t166 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range841 km522 mi
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score77/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Most powerful347 hp259 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Best overall score72/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333hp248kW | 347hp259kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.4s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph Calculated | 53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.6s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 313Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 841km522mi Calculated | 530km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,619cc282cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,433mm175in | 4,516mm178in |
| Width | 1,698mm67in | 1,723mm68in |
| Height | 1,373mm54in | 1,387mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,412mm56in | 1,509mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,434mm56in | 1,483mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 395L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 95L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 5,700 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.6 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 333 hp 248 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 has 14 hp more than Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 5.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 and Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 841 km 522 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 530 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 333 hp 248 kW | 5.6 s | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB8 (E36)4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp 248 kW | 347 hp 259 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 841 km 522 mi | 530 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 395 L 13.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B8 (E36) 4.6 i V8 32V
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 311 km (193 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























