Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12)
Car comparison
Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8vsBentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GTC II
6.0 W12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed317 km/h197 mph
- Highest torque730 Nm538 lb-ft
- Lightest2,020 kg4,453 lb
- Best power-to-weight267 hp/t199 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions224 g/km
- Best estimated range729 km453 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score81/100
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12
- Most powerful567 hp423 kW
- Best practicality score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 540hp403kW | 567hp423kW |
| Torque | 730Nm538lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,495kg5,501lb |
| Gross weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | 2,900kg6,393lb |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.9s99% target: 314 km/h / 195 mph Calculated | 91.9s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.2s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 23L/100 km10.2mpg US12.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 267hp/t199kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 361Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 729km453mi Calculated | 604km375mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,894mm193in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,894mm75in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,373mm54in | 1,403mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,855mm112in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,594mm63in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,655mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 350L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 224g/km | 347g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 5,200-6,250 rpm | 2,800-5,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.2 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 540 hp 403 kW |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 has 27 hp more than Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 314 km/h 195 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 4.4 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 4.7 s |
Although Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 has more power, Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12: 5.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 729 km 453 mi |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 604 km 375 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 540 hp 403 kW | 4.4 s | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW | 4.7 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 540 hp 403 kW | 567 hp 423 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 729 km 453 mi | 604 km 375 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 224 g/km | 347 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8 | Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 26.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 3,911 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 475 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 125 km (78 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 123 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12
- Has 27 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























