Bentley Continental GTC II
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC II Speed 6.0 W12vsAlpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina B6 Cabrio (F12)
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8
- Lightest2,020 kg4,453 lb
- Best power-to-weight267 hp/t199 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions224 g/km
- Best estimated range729 km453 mi
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score81/100
Bentley Continental GTC II Speed 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed327 km/h203 mph
- Most powerful616 hp459 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best overall score74/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 616hp459kW | 540hp403kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 730Nm538lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,495kg5,501lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,430kg5,357lb |
| Top speed | 327 km/h 203 mph | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.5s99% target: 324 km/h / 201 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 314 km/h / 195 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.5s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.7L/100 km10.4mpg US12.4mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 247hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 267hp/t199kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 321Nm/t215lb-ft/ton Calculated | 361Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | 729km453mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 4,894mm193in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,894mm75in |
| Height | 1,394mm55in | 1,373mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,855mm112in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,637mm64in |
| Trunk volume | - | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 350L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 347g/km | 224g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC II Speed 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 5,200-6,250 rpm | 2,800-5,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.5 s | 13.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 77.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 327 km/h 203 mph | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 119 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 616 hp 459 kW |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 540 hp 403 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC II Speed 6.0 W12 has 76 hp more than Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Continental GTC II Speed 6.0 W12: 76 hp (57 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 327 km/h 203 mph |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 317 km/h 197 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 4.4 s |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 4.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Continental GTC II Speed 6.0 W12: 5.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 604 km 375 mi |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 729 km 453 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 616 hp 459 kW | 4.4 s | 327 km/h 203 mph |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 540 hp 403 kW | 4.4 s | 317 km/h 197 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12 | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (F12)4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 616 hp 459 kW | 540 hp 403 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 327 km/h 203 mph | 317 km/h 197 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | 729 km 453 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 347 g/km | 224 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC II Speed 6.0 W12 | Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC II Speed 6.0 W12
- Has 76 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alpina B6 Cabrio (F12) 4.4 V8
- Is 475 kg lighter
- Uses 5.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 125 km (78 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 123 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























