Car comparison

Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8vsBentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpina B5 (E60)

4.4 V8

500 hp4398 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2005-2008
VS

Bentley Arnage T

6.8i V8 Biturbo

507 hp6761 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    314 km/h
    195 mph
  • Lightest
    1,720 kg
    3,792 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    291 hp/t
    217 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.6 L/100 km
    12.6 mpg US
    15.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    569 km
    354 mi
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best overall score
    85/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
Power
500hp373kW
507hp378kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
1,000Nm738lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
2,585kg5,699lb
Gross weight
2,260kg4,982lb
3,065kg6,757lb
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
288 km/h
179 mph
To 99% top speed
51.1s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph
Calculated
67.5s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
12.0s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
19.5L/100 km12.1mpg US14.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK
28.8L/100 km8.2mpg US9.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
13.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb
Calculated
196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
407Nm/t272lb-ft/ton
Calculated
387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
569km354mi
Calculated
492km306mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,398cc268cu in
6,761cc413cu in
Length
4,841mm191in
5,400mm213in
Width
1,846mm73in
1,900mm75in
Height
1,468mm58in
1,515mm60in
Wheelbase
2,888mm114in
3,116mm123in
Front track
1,566mm62in
1,602mm63in
Rear track
1,574mm62in
1,602mm63in
Max trunk volume
520L
374L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
96L
CO2 emissions-
465g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 BiturboPowerTorque
  • Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V85,500 rpm4,250 rpm5,750 rpm
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo4,200 rpm3,200 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.0 s
16.2 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
288 km/h
179 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.5 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
13.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
204 km/h
127 mph
181 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8
500 hp
373 kW
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
507 hp
378 kW

Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo has 7 hp more than Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
2,585 kg
5,699 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8
314 km/h
195 mph
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
288 km/h
179 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V84.7 s
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo5.5 s

Although Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo has more power, Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
19.5 L/100 km
12.1 mpg US
14.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: 7.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
196 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8
569 km
354 mi
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
492 km
306 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8
500 hp
373 kW
4.7 s
314 km/h
195 mph
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
507 hp
378 kW
5.5 s
288 km/h
179 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,841 mm
190.6 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
288 km/h
179 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
374 L
13.2 cu ft
Length
5,400 mm
212.6 in
Height
1,515 mm
59.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
288 km/h
179 mph
19.5 L/100 km
12.1 mpg US
14.5 mpg UK

Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.7 s
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
19.5 L/100 km
12.1 mpg US
14.5 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
196 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
19.5 L/100 km
12.1 mpg US
14.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
Power
500 hp
373 kW
507 hp
378 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
5.5 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
288 km/h
179 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
2,585 kg
5,699 lb
Fuel consumption
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
19.5 L/100 km
12.1 mpg US
14.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,841 mm
190.6 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
374 L
13.2 cu ft
Length
5,400 mm
212.6 in
Height
1,515 mm
59.6 in
Range score
569 km
354 mi
492 km
306 mi
CO2 score
-
465 g/km
Trunk score
520 L
18.4 cu ft
374 L
13.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
196 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo
Consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK19.5 L/100 km12.1 mpg US14.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.53 LC100 km34.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.64 LC100 mi54.92 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal2,925 L773 US gal643 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,229 LC/year5,119 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8

  • Is 865 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 7.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 95 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 77 km (48 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 146 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 300 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8
Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4 V8
5.0 V10
VS
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8vsBMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10
6.8i V8 Biturbo
6.7 i V8 16V
VS
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 BiturbovsBentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V
4.4 V8
AMG E 63 V8
VS
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006AMG E 63 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 BiturbovsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
4.4 V8
AMG S 63 V8
VS
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)AMG S 63 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 BiturbovsBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
4.4 V8
AMG S 55 V8
VS
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 BiturbovsBentleyFlying Spur II4.0 V8
4.4 V8
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8vsAUDIS8 (D3)5.2 FSI V10
6.8i V8 Biturbo
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 BiturbovsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
4.4 V8
AMG E 55 V8
VS
AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 BiturbovsBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 vs Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster