Alpina B5 (E60)
Car comparison
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W211) AMG E 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W211)
AMG E 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight291 hp/t217 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) AMG E 55 V8
- Lowest city consumption16.1 L/100 km14.6 mpg US17.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range620 km385 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.1s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 42.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.0s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated | 259hp/t193kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 407Nm/t272lb-ft/ton Calculated | 381Nm/t255lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km354mi Calculated | 620km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,841mm191in | 4,849mm191in |
| Width | 1,846mm73in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,412mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,888mm114in | 2,854mm112in |
| Front track | 1,566mm62in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 520L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) AMG E 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | 6,100 rpm | 2,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.0 s | 13.4 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 204 km/h 127 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 has 24 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) AMG E 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) AMG E 55 V8 and Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | 4.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) AMG E 55 V8: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | 569 km 354 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | 620 km 385 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.7 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 354 mi | 620 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8
- Has 24 hp more
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Has 49 km/h (30 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) AMG E 55 V8
- Has 51 km (32 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























