Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
SVR 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Lightest1,830 kg4,034 lb
- Best power-to-weight279 hp/t208 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions227 g/km
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score81/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8
- Most powerful575 hp429 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best estimated range813 km505 mi
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 575hp429kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,000kg6,614lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 44.9s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated | 62.5s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 653km406mi Calculated | 813km505mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,891cc176cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | - |
| Height | 1,693mm67in | 1,803mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,818mm111in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | - | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 278mm11in |
| Trunk volume | - | 780L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,686L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 104L |
| CO2 emissions | 227g/km | 294g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 14.3 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 has 65 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 65 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 3.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 4.5 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 653 km 406 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 813 km 505 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW | 4.5 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 |
| 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 575 hp 429 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 653 km 406 mi | 813 km 505 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 227 g/km | 294 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 780 L 27.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 22.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 3,360 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
- Is 480 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 67 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8
- Has 65 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 159 km (99 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























