Car comparison

Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayenne III

Turbo 4.0 V8

550 hp3996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2023
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

SVR 5.0 V8

575 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2017-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    286 km/h
    178 mph
  • Highest torque
    770 Nm
    568 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,175 kg
    4,795 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    253 hp/t
    189 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.9 L/100 km
    19.8 mpg US
    23.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.4 L/100 km
    14.3 mpg US
    17.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    272 g/km
  • Best overall score
    87/100
  • Best performance score
    85/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Power
550hp410kW
575hp429kW
Torque
770Nm568lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,175kg4,795lb
2,310kg5,093lb
Gross weight
2,935kg6,471lb
3,000kg6,614lb
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
283 km/h
176 mph
To 99% top speed
57.2s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph
Calculated
62.5s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
4.5s
0-200 km/h
12.8s
Calculated
14.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
4.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK
18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.0s
Calculated
12.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb
Calculated
249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
354Nm/t237lb-ft/ton
Calculated
303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
756km470mi
Calculated
813km505mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,996cc244cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,926mm194in
4,879mm192in
Width
1,983mm78in
-
Height
1,673mm66in
1,803mm71in
Wheelbase
2,895mm114in
2,923mm115in
Front track-
1,693mm67in
Rear track-
1,686mm66in
Ground clearance-
278mm11in
Trunk volume
745L
780L
Max trunk volume
1,680L
1,686L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
90L
104L
CO2 emissions
272g/km
294g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V85,750-6,000 rpm1,960-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
4.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
4.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.8 s
14.3 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
283 km/h
176 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.0 s
12.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
194 km/h
121 mph
188 km/h
117 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 has 25 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
770 Nm
568 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
2,175 kg
4,795 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
2,310 kg
5,093 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
286 km/h
178 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
283 km/h
176 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V84.1 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V84.5 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 has more power, Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
253 hp/t
189 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
756 km
470 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
813 km
505 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.1 s
286 km/h
178 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW
4.5 s
283 km/h
176 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
745 L
26.3 cu ft
Length
4,926 mm
193.9 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
4.1 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
4.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
253 hp/t
189 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
575 hp
429 kW
Torque
770 Nm
568 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
4.5 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
283 km/h
176 mph
Lightness
2,175 kg
4,795 lb
2,310 kg
5,093 lb
Fuel consumption
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
745 L
26.3 cu ft
Length
4,926 mm
193.9 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Range score
756 km
470 mi
813 km
505 mi
CO2 score
272 g/km
294 g/km
Trunk score
745 L
26.3 cu ft
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
253 hp/t
189 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8
Consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.83 LC100 km22.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.51 LC100 mi36.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,124 LC/year3,360 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 135 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 22 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Has 56 km (35 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 35 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Turbo 4.0 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsMaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsBentleyBentayga4.0 V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
GTS 4.0 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0i V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo S 4.8 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsBentleyBentaygaFacelift 20204.0 V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
Turbo S 4.5 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Turbo S 4.5 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
Turbo 2.9 V6
VS
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018Turbo 2.9 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsAston MartinDBX4.0 V8
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster