Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014
Turbo S 4.8 V8
570 hp4806 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2015-2017
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
SVR 5.0 V8
575 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2017-2022
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed284 km/h176 mph
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lightest2,235 kg4,927 lb
- Best power-to-weight255 hp/t190 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions267 g/km
- Best estimated range870 km540 mi
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score76/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8
- Most powerful575 hp429 kW
- Largest trunk780 L
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 570hp425kW | 575hp429kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,235kg4,927lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | 3,000kg6,614lb |
| Top speed | 284 km/h 176 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.7s99% target: 281 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 62.5s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.0s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 870km540mi Calculated | 813km505mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,806cc293cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,855mm191in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,954mm77in | - |
| Height | 1,702mm67in | 1,803mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,661mm65in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 278mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 670L | 780L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | 1,686L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 104L |
| CO2 emissions | 267g/km | 294g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8PowerTorque
- Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.0 s | 14.3 s |
| Top speed | 284 km/h 176 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 570 hp 425 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 has 5 hp more than Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 4.1 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 4.5 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 has more power, Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 870 km 540 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 813 km 505 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 570 hp 425 kW | 4.1 s | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW | 4.5 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 |
| 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 570 hp 425 kW | 575 hp 429 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 284 km/h 176 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 870 km 540 mi | 813 km 505 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 267 g/km | 294 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | 780 L 27.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 22.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 3,360 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 57 km (35 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 27 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsMaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo S 4.8 V8
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsBentleyBentayga4.0 V8
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Turbo S 4.5 V8
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsBentleyBentaygaFacelift 20204.0 V8
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8