Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDMvsSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.2 JTDM

190 hp2143 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2022
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI330

186 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,055 km
    655 mi
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
190hp142kW
186hp139kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
78.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
91.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
48.2s
Calculated
56.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton
Calculated
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,055km655mi
Calculated
896km556mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,143cc131cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,686mm184in
4,634mm182in
Width
1,903mm75in
1,883mm74in
Height
1,693mm67in
1,649mm65in
Wheelbase
2,818mm111in
2,791mm110in
Trunk volume-
463L
Max trunk volume-
1,607L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
60L
CO2 emissions
145g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDMSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM3,500 rpm1,750 rpm3,750 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3304,100-6,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
48.2 s
56.1 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM has 4 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
210 km/h
130 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM7.6 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3308.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
1,055 km
655 mi
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
896 km
556 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
210 km/h
130 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
7.6 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
190 hp
142 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.8 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Range score
1,055 km
655 mi
896 km
556 mi
CO2 score
145 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDMSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 159 km (99 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Is 60 kg lighter
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2 JTDM
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
GT TSI330
330TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.2 JTDM
1.5 VGT
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
GT TSI330
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.2 JTDM
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
GT TSI330
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2 JTDM
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
GT TSI330
20d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.2 JTDM
20d
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsBMWX2 (F39)20d
GT TSI330
2.0 T4
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
2.2 JTDM
40 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.2 JTDM
GLB 220d
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM vs Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 - car comparison - FastVsFaster