Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2021
VS

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.2 JTDM

190 hp2143 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM

  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    114 hp/t
    85 kW/t
    8.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    145 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,055 km
    655 mi
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    211 km/h
    131 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,843kg4,063lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Gross weight
2,320kg5,115lb
-
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
82.8s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
78.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
48.2s
Calculated
48.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
870km540mi
Calculated
1,055km655mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,143cc131cu in
Length
4,697mm185in
4,686mm184in
Width
1,882mm74in
1,903mm75in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,693mm67in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,818mm111in
Front track
1,586mm62in
-
Rear track
1,576mm62in
-
Ground clearance
191mm8in
-
Trunk volume
650L
-
Max trunk volume
2,065L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
58L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
145g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDMPowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM3,500 rpm1,750 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
48.2 s
48.2 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
1,843 kg
4,063 lb
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
211 km/h
131 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI7.5 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
870 km
540 mi
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
1,055 km
655 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.5 s
211 km/h
131 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.5 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.6 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,843 kg
4,063 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
Range score
870 km
540 mi
1,055 km
655 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
145 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km9.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi15.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal825 L218 US gal181 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,444 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 183 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 185 km (115 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.2 JTDM
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
2.2 JTDM
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.2 JTDM
1.5 VGT
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
330TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.2 JTDM
20d
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsBMWX2 (F39)20d
2.0 TSI
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolvoXC402.0 D4
2.0 TSI
2.0 B4
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
2.2 JTDM
GLB 220d
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
2.0 TSI
350h
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM - car comparison - FastVsFaster