Skoda Kodiaq I
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIvsLexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus NX II (AZ20)
350h
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed211 km/h131 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,843 kg4,063 lb
- Best power-to-weight103 hp/t77 kW/t9.7 kg/hp
- Best estimated range870 km540 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | LexusNX II (AZ20)350h |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 239Nm176lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,843kg4,063lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 82.8s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 85.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.2s Calculated | 51.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated | 128Nm/t86lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 870km540mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,487cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,697mm185in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,670mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,625mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 191mm8in | 195mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 545L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,065L | 1,436L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 6,000 rpm | 4,300-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | LexusNX II (AZ20)350h |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.2 s | 51.4 s |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 239 Nm 176 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 1,843 kg 4,063 lb |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 7.5 s |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI and Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 870 km 540 mi |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.5 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 239 Nm 176 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,843 kg 4,063 lb | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 870 km 540 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI | Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
- Has 81 Nm more
- Is 27 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 km (6 mi) more estimated range
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























