Car comparison

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350hvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lexus NX II (AZ20)

350h

190 hp2487 ccGasolineAWDCVTNaturally aspiratedSUV2021-present
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Largest trunk
    545 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Highest torque
    240 Nm
    177 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,465 kg
    3,230 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    895 km
    556 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLexusNX II (AZ20)350hMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
190hp142kW
186hp139kW
Torque
239Nm176lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,870kg4,123lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Gross weight
2,380kg5,247lb
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
85.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
73.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
51.3s
Calculated
61.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
128Nm/t86lb-ft/ton
Calculated
164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
859km534mi
Calculated
895km556mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,487cc152cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,660mm183in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,670mm66in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,625mm64in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
195mm8in
180mm7in
Trunk volume
545L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,436L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350hMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XPowerTorque
  • Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h6,000 rpm4,300-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLexusNX II (AZ20)350hMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
51.3 s
61.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
190 hp
142 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h has 4 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
239 Nm
176 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1,465 kg
3,230 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h7.7 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X8.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
859 km
534 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
895 km
556 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
8.3 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
545 L
19.2 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.7 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLexusNX II (AZ20)350hMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
190 hp
142 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
239 Nm
176 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
545 L
19.2 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
859 km
534 mi
895 km
556 mi
Trunk score
545 L
19.2 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLexus NX II (AZ20) 350hMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 115 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Has 1 Nm more
  • Is 405 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

350h
300
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
350h
200t
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
350h
200
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusUX200
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
350h
GLB 220d
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
350h
2.2 JTDM
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
350h
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
350h
2.0 TSI
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
1.5T
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsChevroletSeeker1.5T
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X - car comparison - FastVsFaster