Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.0 GME
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Highest torque625 Nm461 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions175 g/km
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 625Nm461lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,029kg4,473lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 94.3s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 65.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.7s Calculated | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,803mm189in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | - | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,665mm66in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 251mm10in | - |
| Trunk volume | 673L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,731L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 175g/km | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 3,500-4,250 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.7 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 275 hp 205 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 280 hp 209 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME has 5 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 2,029 kg 4,473 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 7.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 275 hp 205 kW | 7.0 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,029 kg 4,473 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 175 g/km | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6
- Has 225 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 200 km (124 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 369 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























