Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.0

200 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,535 kg
    3,384 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    124 hp/t
    92 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    133 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
190hp142kW
200hp149kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,535kg3,384lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Gross weight
2,130kg4,696lb
-
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
76.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
76.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
37.5s
Calculated
39.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
914km568mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,687mm185in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,903mm75in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,671mm66in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,818mm111in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,613mm64in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,653mm65in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
200mm8in
Trunk volume
450L
525L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
64L
CO2 emissions
133g/km
161g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.04,500 rpm1,750 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.5 s
39.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
200 hp
149 kW

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 has 10 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
218 km/h
135 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.07.4 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.07.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,000 km
621 mi
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
914 km
568 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
218 km/h
135 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
200 hp
149 kW
7.2 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.4 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.2 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
914 km
568 mi
CO2 score
133 g/km
161 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.92 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.36 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used765 L202 US gal168 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,339 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 125 kg lighter
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 86 km (53 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 28 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 75 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
2.0
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Cooper SD 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
2.0
20i
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)20i
2.0
20i
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsBMWX1 (F48)20i
2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster