Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0vsVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan II
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions149 g/km
- Best estimated range1,053 km654 mi
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 79.9s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.9s Calculated | 46.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 914km568mi Calculated | 1,053km654mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,687mm185in | 4,486mm177in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,671mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,818mm111in | 2,677mm105in |
| Front track | 1,613mm64in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 525L | 615L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,655L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.9 s | 46.0 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 914 km 568 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,053 km 654 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 914 km 568 mi | 1,053 km 654 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 138 km (86 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























