BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20ivsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions149 g/km
- Best estimated range953 km592 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20i | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | - |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.4s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.1s Calculated | 39.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 953km592mi Calculated | 914km568mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,671mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20i: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20i | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.1 s | 39.8 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 has 8 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 20i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20i and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20i and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 953 km 592 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 914 km 568 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.4 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20i | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 953 km 592 mi | 914 km 568 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20i | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























