AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range1,226 km762 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,415kg5,324lb | - |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.3s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 76.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.0s Calculated | 39.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,226km762mi Calculated | 914km568mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,671mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.0 s | 39.9 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 has 10 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 7.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,226 km 762 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 914 km 568 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,226 km 762 mi | 914 km 568 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 312 km (194 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























