Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.0

200 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    161 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    914 km
    568 mi
  • Largest trunk
    525 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
192hp143kW
200hp149kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
-
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
76.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
76.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
34.7s
Calculated
39.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
718km446mi
Calculated
914km568mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,687mm185in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,903mm75in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,671mm66in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,818mm111in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,613mm64in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,653mm65in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
200mm8in
Trunk volume
450L
525L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
64L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
161g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.04,500 rpm1,750 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.7 s
39.9 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
200 hp
149 kW

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 has 8 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
222 km/h
138 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.07.3 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.07.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
718 km
446 mi
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
914 km
568 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
7.3 s
222 km/h
138 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
200 hp
149 kW
7.2 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.3 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in
Range score
718 km
446 mi
914 km
568 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
161 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0

  • Is 150 kg lighter
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 196 km (122 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 75 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 1 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
2.0
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
2.0
20i
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)20i
2.0
20i
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsBMWX1 (F48)20i
2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster