Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0vsPorsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Macan I (95B)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions161 g/km
- Best estimated range914 km568 mi
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 252hp188kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,445kg5,390lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 80.6s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.3s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 914km568mi Calculated | 878km546mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,687mm185in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,671mm66in | 1,624mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,818mm111in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,613mm64in | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | 1,651mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 185mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 525L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | 172g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 5,000-6,800 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.3 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 252 hp 188 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 has 28 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 5.7 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 914 km 568 mi |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 878 km 546 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.7 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 252 hp 188 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 914 km 568 mi | 878 km 546 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | 172 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 | Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 36 km (22 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























