Alfa Romeo Spider (916) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6vsVolvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C70 Convertible
2.0 20V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score71/100
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 289Nm213lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.8s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 102.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.4s Calculated | 35.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km330mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,776mm70in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,315mm52in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 147L | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 5,700 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.4 s | 35.1 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW |
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 has 15 hp more than Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo and Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6.3 s |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 1.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.3 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 330 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 147 L 5.2 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Has 21 Nm more
- Has 113 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























