Alfa Romeo Spider (916)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TBvsMercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet
280 SE 3.5 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score49/100
Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8
- Highest torque286 Nm211 lb-ft
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score47/100
- Best economy score71/100
- Best practicality score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 286Nm211lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 105.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 9.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.4s Calculated | 80.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 607km377mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 3,499cc214cu in |
| Length | 4,285mm169in | 4,905mm193in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,320mm52in | 1,435mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,750mm108in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,482mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 110L | 530L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 5,600 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 5,800 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 9.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.4 s | 80.3 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 134 km/h 83 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 286 Nm 211 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 9.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB and Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8: 1.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 200 hp 149 kW | 9.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 286 Nm 211 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 9.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 607 km 377 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,544 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8
- Has 6 Nm more
- Has 420 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























