AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)
Car comparison
AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30VvsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (916)
2.0 V6 TB
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk246 L
- Best overall score48/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.4s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 97.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.4s Calculated | 37.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 722km448mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,976cc182cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,573mm180in | 4,285mm169in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,391mm55in | 1,320mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,654mm104in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,523mm60in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 246L | 110L |
| Max trunk volume | 315L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 233g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 6,300 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 5,600 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.4 s | 37.4 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 220 hp 164 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 200 hp 149 kW |
AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB and AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 7.8 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 7.7 s |
Although AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V has more power, Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB and AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.8 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 722 km 448 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 233 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 246 L 8.7 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 136 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























