Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6vsMercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet
280 SE 3.5 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score47/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score78/100
Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8
- Best estimated range607 km377 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best practicality score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 286Nm211lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 103.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 105.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 9.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 80.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km353mi Calculated | 607km377mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,199cc195cu in | 3,499cc214cu in |
| Length | 4,567mm180in | 4,905mm193in |
| Width | 1,722mm68in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,435mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,750mm108in |
| Front track | 1,505mm59in | 1,482mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,474mm58in | 1,485mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 237L | 530L |
| Max trunk volume | 350L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 5,700 rpm | 3,000-4,600 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 5,800 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 9.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 80.3 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 134 km/h 83 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 has 18 hp more than Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 286 Nm 211 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 8.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 9.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 and Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 and Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 569 km 353 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 607 km 377 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 8.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 200 hp 149 kW | 9.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 |
| 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | 9.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | Mercedes-BenzW111 Cabriolet280 SE 3.5 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 286 Nm 211 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 9.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 353 mi | 607 km 377 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 237 L 8.4 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 | Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 23.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 38.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 3,544 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 24 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz W111 Cabriolet 280 SE 3.5 V8
- Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
- Has 293 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























