Alfa Romeo RZ
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6vsVolvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C70 Convertible
2.0 20V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score82/100
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 245Nm181lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 102.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.3s Calculated | 35.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 753km468mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,060mm160in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,730mm68in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,510mm99in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,465mm58in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,425mm56in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 120L | 260L |
| Max trunk volume | 390L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 5,700 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.3 s | 35.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW |
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo has 15 hp more than Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 7.5 s |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 7.9 s |
Although Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo has more power, Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 753 km 468 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 65 Nm more
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























