Alfa Romeo RZ
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6vsBMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Convertible (E30)
2.3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range775 km482 mi
- Largest trunk303 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score45/100
Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Highest torque245 Nm181 lb-ft
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 245Nm181lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 92.7s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.2s Calculated | 30.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 753km468mi Calculated | 775km482mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 2,302cc140cu in |
| Length | 4,060mm160in | 4,345mm171in |
| Width | 1,730mm68in | 1,680mm66in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,510mm99in | 2,565mm101in |
| Front track | 1,465mm58in | 1,414mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,425mm56in | 1,435mm56in |
| Trunk volume | 120L | 303L |
| Max trunk volume | 390L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 6,750 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.2 s | 30.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 210 hp 157 kW |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 215 hp 160 kW |
BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3 has 5 hp more than Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6 and BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 7.5 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3 and Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3 and Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 753 km 468 mi |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 775 km 482 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.3 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoRZ3.0 i V6 | BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 753 km 468 mi | 775 km 482 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | 303 L 10.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6 | BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo RZ 3.0 i V6
- Has 15 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 22 km (14 mi) more estimated range
- Has 183 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























