Alfa Romeo Junior
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2vsMini Countryman (U25) D 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (U25)
D 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight93 hp/t69 kW/t10.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range938 km583 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136hp101kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 1,965kg4,332lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 88.6s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.1s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 55.3s Calculated | 58.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.6s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 153Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 849km528mi Calculated | 938km583mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,199cc73cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,173mm164in | 4,444mm175in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,544mm61in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,557mm101in | 2,692mm106in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 340L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,205L | 1,450L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 5,750 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.1 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 55.3 s | 58.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.6 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 136 hp 101 kW |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 has 14 hp more than Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 and Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 9.1 s |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 849 km 528 mi |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 938 km 583 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 136 hp 101 kW | 9.1 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp 101 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.1 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 849 km 528 mi | 938 km 583 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 | Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 88 km (55 mi) more estimated range
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























