Alfa Romeo Junior
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2vsHyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Kona II
1.6 T-GDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight100 hp/t74 kW/t10.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk466 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range849 km528 mi
- Best performance score40/100
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136hp101kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 1,965kg4,332lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 83.3s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.1s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 55.3s Calculated | 98.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.6s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated | 100hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 153Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated | 166Nm/t111lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 849km528mi Calculated | 712km442mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,199cc73cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,173mm164in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,544mm61in | 1,585mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,557mm101in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 170mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 340L | 466L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,205L | 1,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 47L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 5,750 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 55.3 s | 98.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.6 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 136 hp 101 kW |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI has 14 hp more than Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 201 km/h 125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 9.1 s |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI and Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 849 km 528 mi |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 712 km 442 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 136 hp 101 kW | 9.1 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp 101 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.1 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 849 km 528 mi | 712 km 442 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | 466 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 | Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 137 km (85 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 126 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























