Volkswagen T-Roc II
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSIvsAlfa Romeo Junior 1.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Junior
1.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,399 kg3,084 lb
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Best estimated range877 km545 mi
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 136hp101kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,399kg3,084lb | 1,500kg3,307lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 89.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.7s Calculated | 55.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 153Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 877km545mi Calculated | 849km528mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,199cc73cu in |
| Length | 4,372mm172in | 4,173mm164in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,573mm62in | 1,544mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,629mm104in | 2,557mm101in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,541mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 340L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | 1,205L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 5,750 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.7 s | 55.3 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 136 hp 101 kW |
Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI has 14 hp more than Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 and Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 1,399 kg 3,084 lb |
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 8.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 9.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI and Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 877 km 545 mi |
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 849 km 528 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 136 hp 101 kW | 9.1 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 136 hp 101 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,399 kg 3,084 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 877 km 545 mi | 849 km 528 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI | Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 101 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























