Alfa Romeo GTV (916)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6vsRenault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane II Coupe
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 224hp167kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,355kg2,987lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 80.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 27.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 682km424mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,285mm169in | 4,228mm166in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | - |
| Height | 1,320mm52in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,617mm103in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,517mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 110L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,190L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 209g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 27.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V has 4 hp more than Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 and Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6.7 s |
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 682 km 424 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 209 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 220 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























