Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6vsAlfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo GTV (916)
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque289 Nm213 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk155 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score71/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Lowest city consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 289Nm213lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,415kg3,120lb |
| Gross weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 89.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 25.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km330mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 2,959cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,285mm169in |
| Width | 1,776mm70in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,318mm52in | 1,320mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,530mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 155L | 110L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 25.9 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 330 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 155 L 5.5 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 24 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Is 30 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























