Alfa Romeo GTV (916)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6vsVolvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C70 Coupe
2.0 20V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score0/100
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk403 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 95.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 29.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,285mm169in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,320mm52in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 110L | 403L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 5,700 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 29.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW |
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo has 5 hp more than Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6.7 s |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 7.5 s |
Although Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo has more power, Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 403 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 45 Nm more
- Has 293 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























