Car comparison

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6vsNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo GTV (916)

3.0 V6

220 hp2959 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe1997-2003
VS

Nissan 200 SX (S14)

2.0 i 16V Turbo

200 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1993-2000

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    220 hp
    164 kW
  • Highest torque
    265 Nm
    195 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    155 hp/t
    116 kW/t
    6.4 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    50/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Power
220hp164kW
200hp149kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
265Nm195lb-ft
Curb weight
1,415kg3,120lb
1,350kg2,976lb
Gross weight
1,820kg4,012lb
1,780kg3,924lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
89.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
87.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
25.9s
Calculated
31.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
155hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
739km459mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,959cc181cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,285mm169in
4,560mm180in
Width
1,780mm70in
1,730mm68in
Height
1,320mm52in
1,295mm51in
Wheelbase
2,540mm100in
2,525mm99in
Front track
1,510mm59in
1,480mm58in
Rear track
1,530mm60in
1,470mm58in
Trunk volume
110L
307L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
65L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V TurboPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V66,300 rpm5,000 rpm6,550 rpm
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo6,400 rpm4,800 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.9 s
31.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
220 hp
164 kW
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
200 hp
149 kW

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 has 20 hp more than Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
265 Nm
195 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
1,415 kg
3,120 lb
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
1,350 kg
2,976 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 and Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 0.8 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
220 hp
164 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
200 hp
149 kW
7.5 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
4,285 mm
168.7 in
Height
1,320 mm
52.0 in
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
307 L
10.8 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Power
220 hp
164 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,415 kg
3,120 lb
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
Fuel consumption
-
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
4,285 mm
168.7 in
Height
1,320 mm
52.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
307 L
10.8 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
Range score
-
739 km
459 mi
Trunk score
110 L
3.9 cu ft
307 L
10.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,310 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 vs Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster