Alfa Romeo GTV (916)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6vsNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 200 SX (S14)
2.0 i 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque265 Nm195 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score55/100
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Largest trunk307 L
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 87.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 31.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 739km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,285mm169in | 4,560mm180in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,730mm68in |
| Height | 1,320mm52in | 1,295mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,480mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 110L | 307L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 31.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 has 20 hp more than Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6.7 s |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 and Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 739 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 307 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Has 197 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























