Nissan 300 ZX (Z31)
Car comparison
Nissan 300 ZX (Z31) 3.0 TurbovsNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 200 SX (S14)
2.0 i 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan 300 ZX (Z31) 3.0 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful229 hp171 kW
- Highest torque326 Nm240 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 229hp171kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 326Nm240lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 87.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.7s Calculated | 31.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 739km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,960cc181cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,540mm179in | 4,560mm180in |
| Width | 1,725mm68in | 1,730mm68in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,295mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,520mm99in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | 1,415mm56in | 1,480mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,435mm56in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | - | 307L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 77L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 300 ZX (Z31) 3.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
- Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo | 5,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.7 s | 31.3 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo | 229 hp 171 kW |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
Nissan 300 ZX (Z31) 3.0 Turbo has 29 hp more than Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo and Nissan 300 ZX (Z31) 3.0 Turbo: 29 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo | 326 Nm 240 lb-ft |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo | 7.1 s |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z31) 3.0 Turbo and Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo | 229 hp 171 kW | 7.1 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 229 hp 171 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 326 Nm 240 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 739 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 307 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 300 ZX (Z31) 3.0 Turbo
- Has 29 hp more
- Has 61 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Is 80 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























