Alfa Romeo GTV (916)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TBvsToyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Celica (T23)
1.8 i GT- R
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful202 hp151 kW
- Highest torque271 Nm200 lb-ft
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score81/100
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Lightest1,190 kg2,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best overall score48/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 202hp151kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 271Nm200lb-ft | 181Nm133lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,190kg2,624lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | - |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 90.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 80.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 34.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 737km458mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,285mm169in | 4,328mm170in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,735mm68in |
| Height | 1,318mm52in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,499mm59in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,478mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 110L | 365L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: Power / Torque
- Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 6,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7,600 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 7,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 34.2 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 202 hp 151 kW |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW |
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB has 20 hp more than Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 7.4 s |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB and Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 202 hp 151 kW | 7.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 202 hp 151 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 737 km 458 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Is 180 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 255 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























