Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6vsAlfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo GTV (916)
2.0 V6 TB
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque289 Nm213 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk155 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Lightest1,370 kg3,020 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range737 km458 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 202hp151kW |
| Torque | 289Nm213lb-ft | 271Nm200lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,370kg3,020lb |
| Gross weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 90.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 31.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km330mi Calculated | 737km458mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 1,996cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,285mm169in |
| Width | 1,776mm70in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,318mm52in | 1,318mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,499mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,506mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 155L | 110L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 6,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 31.8 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 202 hp 151 kW |
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 has 38 hp more than Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 3.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 530 km 330 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 737 km 458 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 202 hp 151 kW | 7.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
| 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 202 hp 151 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 330 mi | 737 km 458 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 155 L 5.5 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 | Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 18 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 207 km (128 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























