Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6vsTesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

510 hp2891 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboSedan2016-2018
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    307 km/h
    191 mph
  • Lightest
    1,580 kg
    3,483 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    323 hp/t
    241 kW/t
    3.1 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    89/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh
Power
510hp380kW
513hp383kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
-
Curb weight
1,580kg3,483lb
1,856kg4,092lb
Gross weight-
2,305kg5,082lb
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
261 km/h
162 mph
To 99% top speed
38.5s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph
Calculated
28.5s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.9s
3.4s
0-200 km/h
9.8s
Calculated
9.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
3.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.4s
Calculated
11.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
323hp/t241kW/t146hp/1000 lb
Calculated
276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton
Calculated
-
Estimated range
682km424mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,891cc176cu in
-
Length
4,639mm183in
4,694mm185in
Width
1,873mm74in
1,849mm73in
Height
1,426mm56in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,875mm113in
Front track
1,555mm61in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,607mm63in
1,580mm62in
Ground clearance-
140mm6in
Trunk volume
480L
425L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
58L
-
CO2 emissions
198g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
3.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.9 s
3.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.8 s
9.6 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
261 km/h
162 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
9.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.4 s
11.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
218 km/h
136 mph
212 km/h
132 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
510 hp
380 kW
TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh
513 hp
383 kW

Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh has 3 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 and Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh: 3 hp (2 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh
1,856 kg
4,092 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
307 km/h
191 mph
TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh
261 km/h
162 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh
276 hp/t
206 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
510 hp
380 kW
3.9 s
307 km/h
191 mph
TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh
513 hp
383 kW
3.4 s
261 km/h
162 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,639 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh
Power
513 hp
383 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
261 km/h
162 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,694 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh
Power
510 hp
380 kW
513 hp
383 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
-
Acceleration
3.9 s
3.4 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
261 km/h
162 mph
Lightness
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
1,856 kg
4,092 lb
Fuel consumption
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,639 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,694 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
682 km
424 mi
-
CO2 score
198 g/km
-
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
276 hp/t
206 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

  • Is 276 kg lighter
  • Has 46 km/h (29 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 vs Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster