Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 T4vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.2 MultiJet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions131 g/km
- Best estimated range1,040 km646 mi
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score93/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 T4 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,831kg4,037lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 70.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 35.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 821km510mi Calculated | 1,040km646mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,650mm183in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,641mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | 131g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 T4 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 35.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 160 hp 119 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T4 has 30 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 8.7 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 8.2 s |
Although Volvo S90 2.0 T4 has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 821 km 510 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 1,040 km 646 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 T4 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 821 km 510 mi | 1,040 km 646 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | 131 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 T4 | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 366 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 219 km (136 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























