Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200dvsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.2 MultiJet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful160 hp119 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,042 km647 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160hp119kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,631kg3,596lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 2,341kg5,161lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 70.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.3s Calculated | 35.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 1,040km646mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,650mm183in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,641mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 131g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 3,200 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 3,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.3 s | 35.2 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 160 hp 119 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 160 hp 119 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 1,631 kg 3,596 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 8.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 1,040 km 646 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.4 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 hp 119 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,631 kg 3,596 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 1,040 km 646 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 131 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 km (1 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 166 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























