Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)

C 200

184 hp1991 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2016-2018
VS

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

2.2 JTD

180 hp2143 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,445 kg
    3,186 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.5 L/100 km
    67.2 mpg US
    80.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    109 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,238 km
    769 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200

  • Fastest top speed
    234 km/h
    145 mph
  • Most powerful
    184 hp
    137 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
184hp137kW
180hp134kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,470kg3,241lb
1,445kg3,186lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
-
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
66.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
60.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
26.9s
Calculated
25.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
569km354mi
Calculated
1,238km769mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
2,143cc131cu in
Length
4,686mm184in
4,643mm183in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,442mm57in
1,436mm57in
Wheelbase
2,840mm112in
2,820mm111in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,570mm62in
1,625mm64in
Trunk volume
480L
480L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
41L
52L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
109g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 2005,500 rpm1,200-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD3,750 rpm1,750 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.9 s
25.8 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
184 hp
137 kW
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
180 hp
134 kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 has 4 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
1,470 kg
3,241 lb
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
1,445 kg
3,186 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
234 km/h
145 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 2007.4 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD6.8 s

Although Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
569 km
354 mi
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
1,238 km
769 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
184 hp
137 kW
7.4 s
234 km/h
145 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
180 hp
134 kW
6.8 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.4 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
184 hp
137 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
6.8 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,470 kg
3,241 lb
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Range score
569 km
354 mi
1,238 km
769 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
109 g/km
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km7.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi11.83 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal630 L166 US gal139 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year1,103 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 25 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 669 km (415 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 53 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
2.2 JTD
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
2.2 JTD
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200
2.2 JTD
C 200
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200
2.2 JTD
1.8 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
2.2 JTD
2.0d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
C 200
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
2.2 JTD
2.0 T4
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD - car comparison - FastVsFaster